unconstitutional

Now retired from the federal bench, Shira Scheindlin says the controversial policing tool was wrong then and still ineffective.

The judge argued that the law's burden of proof is too low.

On Monday, Judge Shira Scheindlin made the landmark ruling that stop-and-frisk is unconstitutional, citing the violation of the fourth and fourteenth amendment. Today, the city plans to appeal her decision, marking the first blow in what promises to be a lengthy legal battle over the city's most prominent policing tactic.

Bloomberg called it a "temporary setback."

The NYPD tells the NY Times it sucks.

Mississippi wants to make sure its state constitution includes rights for "every human being from the moment of fertilization."

A federal judge in Virginia has found that part of President

The merger of the Bronx criminal and supreme courts has been

The owner of the Hampton Luxury Liner bus fleet has filed